Buraq Kinetic
Seed · AED 3.0M

Buraq Kinetic

Workforce Beyond the Horizon. Infrastructure Behind Modern Logistics. ᯓ ✈︎

“The staffing bench that keeps GCC delivery and warehouse floors fully covered.”

Licensed DXB manpower operator · First Step
Cloud for the logistics workforce · The destination
The Workforce Layer Behind Every Supply Chain
01 Executive Summary

Powering the Workforce
Behind Every Delivery. ☄️

|

What it is

Staffing + software

  • Licensed UAE manpower engine — revenue live month 3
  • Workforce OS layered on live operations
  • Infrastructure, not an agency
The problem

Labour can't flex

  • Peak volumes swing 2–4×; hiring takes 30–60 days
  • 8–15% of frontline labour spend leaks monthly
  • Zero per-worker data across the market
Why now

$89B → $120B

  • GCC logistics $89B → $120B by 2031
  • Fulfilment, dark stores and fleets scaling now
  • Every expansion needs people first
Why investable

AED 3.0M seed

  • AED 3.0M seed · revenue M3 · break-even ~M6
  • EBITDA AED 9.0M by Year 3
  • AED 1.0M held as a recoverable deposit
Why scalable

One playbook × 6 markets

  • Peak-shift utilization 85%+ across sectors
  • One licence playbook × six markets
  • 3,000 workers by Y3Q3 · AED 115M by Year 3
02 The Problem

Logistics companies can scale orders overnight.
They cannot scale their workforce overnight.

Demand moves in hours; workforces move in months. And the hiring wall is only the visible cost — five quieter leaks drain an estimated 8–15% of frontline labour spend (Buraq estimate) every month.

Demand whiplash

Volumes swing 2–4× in peak weeks; headcount is fixed by visa cycles and 30–60 day hiring lead times. Missed peaks are permanently lost revenue.

Attrition & unhappiness

Late salaries and dead-end roles drive 6–10% monthly attrition (operator estimate); daily no-shows of 10–15% force overtime and missed SLAs.

Compliance & payroll weight

Visas, sponsorship, WPS payroll, insurance — every worker is a legal obligation; payroll errors trigger fines, disputes and overnight no-show protests.

Blind, analog supply

Agencies supply bodies, not data: unverified skills, no performance analytics, no demand forecasting — clients pay for both overtime spikes and idle hours.

The Problem · Revenue Leakage Map

1 · Worker skill quality
20–30% productivity variance; errors billed back or churned over.

2 · No performance analytics
No per-worker data — clients absorb underperformance blind.

3 · Poor demand forecasting
Rosters by guesswork pay overtime spikes and idle hours.

4 · Worker happiness ignored
6–10%/mo attrition; ~AED 3,000+ re-mobilisation per exit.

5 · Payroll complexity
WPS errors → fines, disputes, overnight no-show protests.

The compounding bill
Estimated 8–15% of frontline labour spend leaks monthly (Buraq estimate). Recovering half is the value proposition.

03 The Solution

A living bench, deployed in hours — with a named fix for every leak.

Layer 1 · Live at launch

Manpower engine

Pre-verified, trained, uniformed bench across 8 logistics roles — monthly, daily, hourly or seasonal, with contractual replacement SLAs, deployed in 24–72 hours.

Layer 2 · Months 6–18

Compliance & ops spine

Visas, WPS payroll, insurance, training academy, welfare — one central spine; every worker legal and productive from shift one.

Layer 3 · Months 18–30

Workforce OS

Dashboards, worker apps, AI scheduling — every shift of data compounds into software-margin infrastructure no competitor can buy.

The peak-shift engine

Logistics peaks don't overlap — q-commerce evenings, warehouse nights, retail promo days, port cycles, event seasons. One cross-trained bench shuffles across them, targeting 85%+ utilization vs ~65% single-sector norm (assumption). The same worker earns more revenue at the same pay — that spread is Buraq's structural margin and the answer to demand whiplash.

The Solution · Problem–Fit Map

Operator problemBuraq answerMetric we report to clients
Worker skill qualityRole certification before first shiftProductivity vs site baseline
No performance analyticsPer-worker ledger in the client consoleWeekly pod scorecards
Poor demand forecastingCross-client demand engineFill rate ≥ 97% · overtime ↓
Worker happinessAbove-market pay + career ladderAttrition < 4%/mo vs 6–10% norm
Payroll complexityTransparent in-app payroll rail100% on-time WPS · ~0 disputes
Infrastructure publishes its numbers — targets are operating assumptions that become contractual reporting once live.
04 Market & Customers

Riding the GCC's logistics super-cycle.

Labour is 25–35% of logistics operating cost — the largest controllable line. Every new fulfilment centre, dark store and fleet needs frontline people before anything else.

GCC market growth · 2026 → 2031

$40B$80B$120B89120Freight & logistics15.423.0Warehousing & dist.4.26.3Courier, express & parcelUSD billions · grey = 2026, gold = 2031E (Mordor Intelligence / IMARC; CEP & warehousing 2031 extrapolated at cited CAGRs)

Read: the addressable pool grows ~35% in five years — while frontline labour supply stays structurally slow.

Where Buraq deploys · Year 3 target

Y3 demandby segment
3PL & fulfilment 40%Q-commerce 25%Retail & FMCG 20%Ports & industrial 10%Construction & events 5%

Twelve sectors, one shared pain — counter-cyclical sectors feed the peak-shift engine with off-peak demand. Split is a planning assumption.

TAM — Total Addressable Market. The full annual spend Buraq could theoretically serve: GCC frontline logistics labour cost open to outsourced staffing (25–35% labour share × outsourced-eligible roles).

TAM

AED 9–12B / yr — GCC frontline logistics labour spend addressable by outsourced staffing.

SAM — Serviceable Available Market. The UAE + KSA slice Buraq's licence model reaches in its expansion window, across 3PL, e-commerce, retail, food delivery and warehousing.

SAM

AED 2.5–3.5B / yr — UAE + KSA outsourced logistics staffing.

SOM — Serviceable Obtainable Market. Buraq’s Year-3 capture: 2,500–3,000 deployed UAE workers × AED 3,500/worker/month × 12 — 3–5% of SAM.

SOM · Year 3

AED 110–130M / yr — 2,500–3,000 workers across the UAE (KSA revenue begins Y4).

Market sizes: Mordor Intelligence & IMARC (2026). TAM/SAM/SOM and labour-share figures are Buraq assumption-based statistics — tap ⓘ for the logic.
05 Services & Pricing

Every role. Every format.
We pay workers more, keep less — and win on volume.

The workforce bench

Riders
Drivers
Pickers
Packers
Loaders
Sorters
Dispatchers
Supervisors

Formats: monthly dedicated · hourly/daily on-demand · seasonal surge (+15–30%) · managed pods with supervision. Visas, WPS payroll, insurance, uniforms, training and SLA replacements included — one partner, one invoice.

Pay transparency — the worker wins first

Industry practice hides what reaches the worker. Buraq publishes it: above-market packages, on-time WPS pay, visible deductions. Satisfied workers stay (<4% vs 6–10% attrition), show up, and refer — the supply-side moat no marketing budget can buy. The full margin logic lives on the Business Model slide.

Fully loaded worker cost AED 2,690/mo — hover or tap any segment+ AED 810 margin = AED 3,500 bill
Base salary · AED 1,800Accommodation & transport · AED 460Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) · AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training · AED 140Field coordination (area coordinators, ~1:50) · AED 120Bench float & replacement buffer · AED 50Buraq margin · AED 810

Market Workforce Cost Benchmark — click any role to expand the cost lines

Role · monthly, AED (assumptions)Direct Employer
nnoonaAmazontTalabatLLuluCCarrefour
Outsource Provider
TTransguardTTASCIInnovations GroupRRapidoorG4Gulf G4
Buraq Kinetic
▸ Warehouse Picker & PackerAED 2,950/mo
internal cost · no margin
AED 3,400/mo
~32% provider margin
AED 3,300/mo
GP 800 · 24% margin
Basic salary AED 1,900 vs ~1,500 marketAccommodation & transport AED 290Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training AED 140Operational / admin allocation AED 50Fully loaded cost AED 2,500Client billing AED 3,300Gross profit 800 · 24%

All figures are assumptions, not contracted prices, and use the same cost taxonomy as the Worker Cost Build-Up (Financial Model slide). Buraq pays the highest basic salary in the column — workers choose Buraq, stay longer, and show up. The margin is deliberately thinner than outsourcers’ ~32%: the difference is the retention moat.

▸ Delivery RiderAED 3,800/mo
internal cost · no margin
AED 4,300/mo
~33% provider margin
AED 4,100/mo
GP 850 · 21% margin
Basic salary AED 2,300 vs ~2,000 marketAccommodation & transport AED 560Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training AED 140Operational / admin allocation AED 130Fully loaded cost AED 3,250Client billing AED 4,100Gross profit 850 · 21%

All figures are assumptions, not contracted prices, and use the same cost taxonomy as the Worker Cost Build-Up (Financial Model slide). Buraq pays the highest basic salary in the column — workers choose Buraq, stay longer, and show up. The margin is deliberately thinner than outsourcers’ ~33%: the difference is the retention moat.

▸ Order Management ExecutivesAED 4,100/mo
internal cost · no margin
AED 4,800/mo
~34% provider margin
AED 4,600/mo
GP 1,100 · 24% margin
Basic salary AED 2,800 vs ~2,400 marketAccommodation & transport AED 330Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training AED 140Operational / admin allocation AED 110Fully loaded cost AED 3,500Client billing AED 4,600Gross profit 1,100 · 24%

All figures are assumptions, not contracted prices, and use the same cost taxonomy as the Worker Cost Build-Up (Financial Model slide). Buraq pays the highest basic salary in the column — workers choose Buraq, stay longer, and show up. The margin is deliberately thinner than outsourcers’ ~34%: the difference is the retention moat.

▸ Logistics AssociatesAED 3,200/mo
internal cost · no margin
AED 3,750/mo
~32% provider margin
AED 3,600/mo
GP 870 · 24% margin
Basic salary AED 2,100 vs ~1,700 marketAccommodation & transport AED 300Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training AED 140Operational / admin allocation AED 70Fully loaded cost AED 2,730Client billing AED 3,600Gross profit 870 · 24%

All figures are assumptions, not contracted prices, and use the same cost taxonomy as the Worker Cost Build-Up (Financial Model slide). Buraq pays the highest basic salary in the column — workers choose Buraq, stay longer, and show up. The margin is deliberately thinner than outsourcers’ ~32%: the difference is the retention moat.

▸ Team LeaderAED 4,900/mo
internal cost · no margin
AED 5,600/mo
~34% provider margin
AED 5,400/mo
GP 1,230 · 23% margin
Basic salary AED 3,400 vs ~2,900 marketAccommodation & transport AED 370Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training AED 140Operational / admin allocation AED 140Fully loaded cost AED 4,170Client billing AED 5,400Gross profit 1,230 · 23%

All figures are assumptions, not contracted prices, and use the same cost taxonomy as the Worker Cost Build-Up (Financial Model slide). Buraq pays the highest basic salary in the column — workers choose Buraq, stay longer, and show up. The margin is deliberately thinner than outsourcers’ ~34%: the difference is the retention moat.

▸ SupervisorsAED 6,000/mo
internal cost · no margin
AED 6,900/mo
~35% provider margin
AED 6,600/mo
GP 1,440 · 22% margin
Basic salary AED 4,300 vs ~3,700 marketAccommodation & transport AED 420Visa, medical & EID (amortised /24 mo) AED 120Insurance, uniform, welfare & training AED 140Operational / admin allocation AED 180Fully loaded cost AED 5,160Client billing AED 6,600Gross profit 1,440 · 22%

All figures are assumptions, not contracted prices, and use the same cost taxonomy as the Worker Cost Build-Up (Financial Model slide). Buraq pays the highest basic salary in the column — workers choose Buraq, stay longer, and show up. The margin is deliberately thinner than outsourcers’ ~35%: the difference is the retention moat.

Rate cards (assumptions): monthly AED 3,200–3,900 · hourly 28–40 · daily 190–280. Verticals served: e-commerce/3PL, q-commerce & delivery, retail & FMCG, ports & industrial, construction & events.
06 Platform & App Roadmap

Three releases. Each one earns the next.

Phase 1 · by end of Year 1

Recruitment MVP

Multi-country candidates apply in-app: documents, vacant roles, screening questionnaire. The funnel becomes an asset. Client side: workforce requests, live availability, attendance tracking, billing.

Phase 2 · Year 2

Employee layer

Internal opportunities, performance tracking, experience record, career mobility — the retention machine that keeps attrition below market.

Phase 3 · Year 3

Payroll & metrics layer

Payroll visibility, worker metrics, performance dashboards, attendance–payroll–ops integration. The app becomes the OS — and the SaaS sold to clients. Every shift trains the AI scheduler no competitor can buy.

Each phase digitises a process Buraq already runs manually for revenue — sequenced by operating need, not product fantasy.
07 Business & Revenue Model

Manpower pays the bills. The platform builds the empire.

StreamWho pays — and for whatPricing (AED, assumption)Revenue typeMargin — whyLive from
Monthly staffing
One invoice replaces an entire HR, visa and housing operation.
Logistics & e-commerce operators pay a fixed monthly rate per deployed worker — Buraq handles visa, housing, payroll and replacement.3,200–3,900 / worker / moRecurring — the anchor revenue22–26% — staffing economics: bill minus fully loaded worker costLaunch (M3)
Hourly & daily flex
Higher rate per hour compensates the bench that makes it instant.
Clients pay only for hours or days actually worked — used to cover absences and short spikes.28–40 / hr · 190–280 / dayUsage-based28–35% — premium rate for on-demand availabilityLaunch (M3)
Seasonal / peak surge
The peak weeks competitors dread are Buraq’s highest-margin weeks.
Clients pre-book worker blocks for Ramadan, White Friday and sale peaks at a committed premium.+15–30% on committed blocksSeasonal — contracted ahead30–38% — peak pricing on pre-committed volumeLaunch (M3)
Managed pods
The client buys an outcome, not headcount.
Clients pay one team fee for a supervised squad with KPIs — Buraq runs the pod end-to-end.Team fee + performance bonusRecurring + performance upside25–30% — supervision priced in, bonus on resultsM6+
Payroll services
The licence and platform monetised beyond Buraq’s own bench.
Companies with their own staff pay Buraq to run payroll / WPS; hiring clients pay per placement.45–70 / employee / mo · 4–8K / placementRecurring + one-time fees40–70% — software and process, minimal direct costM6–9+
Technology & performance fees
The staffing base becomes the distribution channel for software.
Clients subscribe to the Workforce OS per site, plus a share of measured productivity gains.1,500–5,000 / site / mo + gainshareSaaS — recurring software revenue75%+ — software margins on operational dataM18+

Recurring staffing base

Monthly contracts and managed pods — ~85% of Year 1 revenue, the anchor load that absorbs the bench in troughs.

ⓘ revenue drivers

On-demand & surge

Hourly, daily and seasonal blocks at premium rates — where the peak-shift engine converts bench float into the highest margins.

ⓘ revenue drivers

Services & software

Y3 mixrevenue
Staffing 70%Managed & payroll 20%Tech 10%
ⓘ revenue drivers

The strategic trade

~25% margin vs the industry's 30–35% — the give-back funds above-market worker pay, welfare and retention.

ⓘ strategic rationale

Why lower margin wins

Retention below 4%/mo saves re-hiring cost, keeps trained crews on floors, and compounds the fill-rate reputation clients buy.

ⓘ strategic rationale

Volume is the model

Scale + utilization beat spread: cross-industry peak-shifting makes each worker yield more without charging clients more.

ⓘ strategic rationale
Moat: licence + bench liquidity + worker loyalty + per-shift data → AI scheduling nobody can buy without running the workforce first. Blue-ocean position: we compete on outcomes, not rate-card price. Every card above opens a strategic drill-down.
08 Operational Blueprint

A machine that turns applicants into billable, reliable shifts.

i · Source

Recruit

Ethical channels, referrals, verified documents.

ii · Legalise

Visa & onboard

Sponsorship, medical, EID, insurance, WPS.

iii · Prepare

Train & equip

Role certification, safety, uniforms, app.

iv · Deploy

Match & dispatch

Allocation to sites; live ETA & attendance.

v · Manage

Supervise

1 supervisor : 20–25 workers; KPI reviews, payroll, welfare.

vi · Guarantee

Replace

Bench liquidity covers absence within SLA.

The bench principle

8–12% of the workforce is paid float. It looks like idle cost; it is the product — instant replacements and surge capacity are what clients pay premiums for.

Compliance by design

Dedicated PRO & compliance officer from day one; every worker WPS-paid, insured, audit-ready. In UAE manpower, compliance is the licence to operate.

Who we serve & deploy

The 3PL ops director drowning in Ramadan ramp; the dark-store lead fighting rider churn; the picker who wants legal sponsorship, on-time pay and a path to supervisor. Worker experience is strategy — the best-treated bench is the supply-side moat.

09 Go-To-Market & Sales

Land with the surge. Expand with the floor.

Land

Solve one painful shift

Enter via surge and replacement pain — a Ramadan block, a 48-hour ramp. Small commitment, fast proof.

Prove

Publish the numbers

Fill rate, attendance %, deploy speed reported weekly — data-backed reliability converts pilots into contracts.

Expand

Take the whole floor

10 flex workers → managed pods → multi-site monthly contracts → payroll & platform attach.

First 90 days · Dubai

8–12 anchor conversations from founding network → 5 paid pilots → 3 monthly contracts → 150 workers deployed by M4. Channels: founder-led enterprise sales, free-zone communities (Dubai South, JAFZA, DIP), Seamless & Gulfood tracks, proof-based LinkedIn case studies, client + worker referral flywheels.

Sales economics

Pipeline: audit → 2-week paid pilot → contract → pod expansion. Cycle 3–10 weeks. Target CAC < AED 8,000 vs first-year gross profit AED 350,000+ per mid-size account (40 workers × AED 810 GP/mo — assumption). Referrals keep blended CAC falling as logos land.

10 Competition & SWOT

Agencies can't build software.
Apps can't sponsor visas. Buraq does both.

Six camps compete for this spend — traditional agencies, labour-supply firms, outsourced ops, recruiters, workforce tech, and in-house models (who become clients, not rivals). None owns the whole stack.

Traditional agenciesOutsourced opsGig / shift appsBuraq Kinetic
What you actually getA CV supplier — finds people, you employ themYour whole operation handed to a contractorAn app that broadcasts shifts to gig workersA ready, employed, insured workforce on demand — plus the software running it
Speed of deploymentDays to weeksMonths to contractHours — but unverified strangersHours — verified, trained, insured
Legal & visa complianceYou carry visa & sponsorship riskContractor-bound, inflexibleGrey-zone; client exposureBuraq is the licensed sponsor — zero client exposure
Worker reliabilityMarket-floor pay → churnMarket-floor pay → churnNo-shows are the normAbove-market pay · <4% monthly attrition target
Recurring staffingOne-off placementsYes, rigid annual termsShift-by-shift onlyMonthly contracts + flex on the same bench
Payroll & attendanceNot their problemOpaque, contractor-runVariable, dispute-proneWPS payroll + in-app attendance, client-visible
Technology & analyticsNoneSingle-site reportingRatings onlyPer-worker ledger + demand forecasting engine
Replacement capacityRestart the searchWait for the contractorRepost and hopeBench-backed same-day replacement
Peak-demand handlingCannot surgeFixed capacitySurge pricing, no guaranteePre-committed surge blocks from a shared bench
GCC scalabilityEmirate-boundContract-by-contractApp without a legal spineLicence playbook × 6 markets + one Workforce OS
Strengths

Licensed spine + deposit capital · founder ops DNA · cross-industry bench · above-market worker proposition.

Weaknesses

Working-capital intensity · thin margins by design · single-market start · unproven brand until logos land.

Opportunities

$89B→$120B super-cycle · analog-agency consolidation · KSA giga-projects · SaaS attach on captive base.

Threats

Regulatory shifts · wage inflation · incumbents copying pricing · funded gig app buying a licence. → Risks slide.

11 Financial Model · Unit Economics

Unit economics you can count on a warehouse floor.

AED 3,500
Blended bill rate / worker / month (assumption)
AED 2,690
Fully loaded worker cost / month (assumption)
~23%
Gross margin · AED 810 / worker / month
~320
Workers at operating break-even (~AED 1.12M/mo revenue)

Revenue ramp · base case — the 36-month build

3M6M9M12MYear 2Year 3break-even M83,000 · Y3Q3M3M12M24M362.86.911.1Gold bars: monthly revenue (AED M) = deployed workers × AED 3,500 + services/SaaS attach · Teal line: monthly gross profit at AED 810/worker contribution · workers M12: 800 · M24: 1,900 · M33: 3,000 (held) · break-even M8 (~320 workers) · base case
Worker cost build-up (monthly)AED
Base salary (UAE market-aligned)1,800
Accommodation & transport460
Visa, medical, EID (amortised /24mo)120
Insurance, uniform, welfare, training140
Field coordination (area coordinators, ~1:50)120
Bench float & replacement buffer50
Fully loaded cost2,690

Fixed opex & break-even

Fixed opex ~AED 260K/mo (Y1) covers the 11-person core, office, tech and S&M — fully absorbed by ~320 deployed workers (260,000 ÷ 810). Beyond that point every additional worker is contribution. Opex scales to ~AED 780K/mo (Y2) and ~AED 1.4M/mo (Y3, incl. KSA) while falling from 20% to 9% of revenue — the operating-leverage proof.

12 Growth Forecast & Scenario Engine

Cost, revenue, profit — and the month they cross.

Three curves, four levers, one break-even line.

Month-on-month cost, revenue and profit for the selected scenario — the gold band marks the break-even month.

Revenue / moTotal cost / moProfit / mo

Lever 1

Client conversion pace

Best 1.2× · Base 1.0× · Cons 0.7×

ⓘ sensitivity impact
Lever 2

Wage inflation

Best 0.98× · Base 1.0× · Cons 1.03×

ⓘ sensitivity impact
Lever 3

Fill rate delivered

Best 98% · Base 97% · Cons 94%

ⓘ sensitivity impact
Lever 4

Receivable days

Best 35 · Base 45 · Cons 60

ⓘ sensitivity impact

Unit Economics Dashboard · 3 years

Revenue/worker AED 3,500 → 3,546/mo · GP/worker 810 → 836 · gross margin 23.1% → 23.6% · workforce 800 → 3,000 · annual gross profit AED 3.5M → 26.2M.

ⓘ full YoY dashboard

Organizational Cost View · 3 years

Twelve central functions grow 16 → 50 heads; management payroll run-rate AED 246K → 782K/mo (EOY) with the 20% annual appraisal applied from Year 3 (×1.20, Y1–Y2 cohort only; new Y3 hires at approved bands) with ramp costs allocated evenly, held inside G&A + ops overhead. Pod supervisors (1:22) are client-billed roles in direct cost; area coordination is the explicit AED 120/worker line inside the 2,690.

ⓘ function-by-function view
Multiplier-style scenario engine applied to the canonical model — levers monitored monthly, reforecast quarterly. The dashboards above are derived from the same model as the P&L and cash bridge.
13 P&L Summary

Year one proves it. Years two and three pay for it.

30M60M90M15.3MYear 160.5MYear 2111.0MYear 3AED millions · revenue = stack height · Y1 turns EBITDA-positive from month 6 (deployment starts M2; management hiring phased with the ramp) · no debt anywhere in the plan
Direct workforce costOperating expensesEBITDA
AED millions · baseY1Y2Y3
Revenue15.360.5111.0
Direct cost of revenue (AED 2,690 / worker / mo)11.746.484.9
Gross profit (margin)3.5 (23.1%)14.1 (23.3%)26.2 (23.6%)
Operating expenses (incl. management appraisal)3.38.617.2
EBITDA (margin)0.3 (1.8%)5.5 (9.1%)9.0 (8.1%)
Net profit (after D&A, interest, 9% UAE CT)0.04.47.2

Quarterly build-up · staff & capex · through Y3Q4

Deployed workers 60 → 3,000 · client sites 5 → 80 · management team 6 → 50 (team plan held at full strength; Y3 build covers AIN, ROE and KSA setup) · cumulative capex AED 3.05M over three years. Overhead loading falls 36% → 14% of revenue — honest leverage at the conservative cap.

ⓘ open full quarterly table

Quarterly P&L · the financial backbone — click any ▸ header to expand its line items

AED millionsY1Q1Y1Q2Y1Q3Y1Q4Y2Q1Y2Q2Y2Q3Y2Q4Y3Q1Y3Q2Y3Q3Y3Q4
▸ REVENUE
Warehouse Staffing0.301.232.083.264.736.147.568.669.9211.5813.6214.18
Last Mile Staffing0.230.961.622.543.674.785.886.747.729.0010.6011.02
Operations Staffing0.130.550.921.452.102.733.363.854.415.156.056.30
Payroll Services0.000.000.000.000.000.070.100.130.170.180.230.28
SaaS Revenue0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.160.200.24
TOTAL REVENUE0.672.734.627.2510.5013.7216.9019.3822.2226.0730.7032.02
▸ COST OF REVENUE
Employee Salaries0.341.402.383.735.407.028.649.9011.3413.2315.5716.20
Field Coordination (area coordinators)0.020.090.160.250.360.470.580.660.760.881.041.08
Accommodation0.060.250.420.660.961.251.541.762.022.352.772.88
Transportation0.030.110.180.290.420.550.670.770.881.031.211.26
Visa & Medical0.020.090.160.250.360.470.580.660.760.881.041.08
Insurance0.010.030.050.080.120.160.190.220.250.290.350.36
Uniforms0.010.020.040.060.090.120.140.170.190.220.260.27
Recruitment Cost0.010.040.070.100.150.200.240.280.320.370.430.45
Operations Cost (incl. services delivery)0.010.050.090.140.210.300.380.440.520.670.800.86
TOTAL COST OF REVENUE0.512.103.555.578.0710.5212.9614.8517.0219.9323.4624.44
GROSS PROFIT0.160.631.071.682.433.203.944.535.206.147.247.58
Gross Margin %24%23%23%23%23%23%23%23%23%24%24%24%
▸ OPERATING EXPENSES
Sales & Marketing0.080.100.110.130.180.240.330.380.500.540.580.62
Technology0.060.070.080.090.120.160.220.260.340.370.400.43
General & Administrative (G&A) — incl. management payroll0.380.430.510.570.801.051.451.702.222.402.582.75
Operations Overhead0.130.150.180.200.280.360.500.590.770.830.890.95
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES0.650.750.880.971.381.812.502.933.834.144.444.74
EBITDA-0.49-0.120.190.711.051.391.441.601.372.002.802.84
EBITDA %-73%-4%4%10%10%10%9%8%6%8%9%9%
▸ EBITDA → NET
Depreciation0.060.060.060.060.170.170.170.170.280.280.280.28
Tax (UAE CT 9%, booked Q4)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.400.000.000.000.68
NET PROFIT-0.55-0.180.130.640.881.211.271.021.091.732.531.88
Net Margin %-83%-7%3%9%8%9%8%5%5%7%8%6%

One-time setup · Dubai

RTA deposit AED 1.0M · licensing & legal 150K · office fit-out 120K · Workforce OS v1 250K · first-150 mobilisation 450K → ~AED 1.97M one-time, of which 1.0M is recoverable.

ⓘ full setup table

Steady-state fixed opex (monthly)

Core team 150K · office 25K · tech run-rate 25K · sales & marketing 35K · welfare & ops base 20K · contingency 10K → ~AED 217K → 325K/mo (phased with hiring), covered by ~308 deployed workers (crossed M6).

ⓘ full opex table
Y1 = Dubai ramp from M2 (avg ~363 deployed, EBITDA-positive from M6, revenue 15.3M) · Y2 = Dubai + Sharjah densification (SHJ Y2Q4, no new deposit) (avg ~1,433, EBITDA 5.5M) · Y3 = AUH launch Y3Q1, UAE-wide scale to the 3,000 cap, KSA setup Y3Q4 (avg ~2,608 + services/SaaS, EBITDA 9.0M with the first 20% appraisal applied). Margin ramps 23.6% → 24.8% on services mix — one model drives every number.
14 Cash & Funding Bridge

Every dirham has a job. Here is the bridge.

1M2M3M+3.00Seed raise−1.51Deposits & licensing−0.77Net ops & capex M1–40.72Cash at M4+0.70Receivables booked1.42Position incl. ARAED millions · months 1–4 only (the seed-landing window) · M4 cash 0.72 is the end of this bridge, not the trough — cash then glides to its monthly low of 0.09 in M11 (quarter-end 0.14, Y1Q4) · no debt · reconciles to the monthly cash plan and the quarterly chartⓘ bridge mechanics
4M8M12MY1Q1Y1Q2Y1Q3Y1Q4Y2Q1Y2Q2Y2Q3Y2Q4Y3Q1Y3Q2Y3Q3Y3Q4trough 0.14 (Y1Q4) · monthly low 0.09 (M11)Series A · Y3Q3 Closing cash · Cash required next quarter = next-quarter opex + capex + due deposits − certain gross-profit cash inflows, floored at AED 0. Excess reserve = closing cash − next-quarter requirement — positive in every quarter: fully self-funded on equity alone. Quarter-end trough 0.14 (Y1Q4); the intra-quarter monthly low is 0.09 in M11 — both views reconcile. AED millions.No debt, no facility, no interest. Deployment starts M2; management hiring is phased with the ramp; AUH launch + AED 1.0M deposit moves to Y3Q1. Funding: seed 3.0 (Y1Q1) · Series A 6.7 (Y3Q3).ⓘ trough & liquidity levers

Quarterly cash & funding table · through Y3Q4

Full 12-quarter bridge: operating P&L, capex, phased visa / licence / emirate deposits (DXB, AUH, SHJ, KSA), funding injections, cumulative position, trough and turn-positive quarter — with the levers an investor can pull. Quarter-end trough AED 0.14M (Y1Q4) with a monthly low of AED 0.09M at M11; EBITDA-positive from M6; never negative in any month or quarter, with no debt at all; closing cash builds to AED 12.3M by Y3Q4.

ⓘ open quarterly table

Series A bridge

Seed carries Buraq to ~800 workers and an ~AED 34M staffing run-rate; operating cash then funds UAE densification. Seed and operating cash carry Buraq through the UAE build-out — SHJ (Y2Q4), AIN (Y3Q2) and ROE (Y3Q3) deposits are self-funded. Series A (indicatively AED 6.7M at Y3Q3, 10% post-money, illustrative) funds KSA setup (Y3Q4) and regional growth. KSA is not treated as live before Y3Q4.

Trough: 0.14M quarter-end (Y1Q4), 0.09M monthly low (M11) · EBITDA-positive from M6 · fully self-funded on seed 3.0 + Series A 6.7 — no debt, no facility, no interest · every figure synchronized with the P&L, unit economics and scenario views. Each card opens the full mechanics.
15 Risks & Mitigation

Eyes open. Playbook ready.

RiskReality checkMitigation
Regulatory & licensing shiftsUAE labour rules evolve; deposits can changeDedicated PRO + counsel; compliance-first design; deposit funded upfront
Client concentrationEarly revenue leans on a few anchorsCap any client at ≤30% of deployed workers by M6; three-sector spread
Worker attrition & wage inflationFrontline churn is structural; wages driftAbove-market pay + bench float priced in; quarterly rate-card reviews
Receivables & cash cycle30–60 day terms vs monthly WPS payrollWorking-capital float carried in the raise (no debt); surge-block advances
Platform executionSoftware builds can driftMVP digitises live operations only; staffing P&L survives regardless
KSA entry complexitySaudization & different sponsorship rulesPhase 3 via local partner/JV with proven UAE playbook and reference clients
16 Rollout Roadmap

One playbook. Six markets.

Phase 1 · M1–12

Dubai — prove the machine

Licence live, RTA deposit placed. First cohort deploys M2; 200 workers by M4 → 800 by M12. Break-even ~M6 (~308 workers), then disciplined, conservative scale. AED 34M run-rate exiting Y1.

App Launch · M12

Recruitment MVP live

Multi-country candidates apply, upload documents and screen in-app — the funnel becomes an asset and the OS gets its first real users.

Phase 2 · M13–24

Abu Dhabi & Sharjah

AUH launch Y3Q1 → ramp Y2Q3; SHJ launch Y2Q4. RTA deposits (AED 1.0M per location, refundable) placed with each launch from operating cash — no borrowing. 1,900 deployed by M24.

Phase 3 · M25–33

UAE completion

SHJ ramp Y3Q1 → Al Ain Y3Q2 → rest of emirates (ROE) Y3Q3 — one RTA deposit per launch (AED 1.0M each, refundable). Full-UAE bench reaches the 3,000-worker cap by Y3Q3.

Phase 4 · M34+

KSA setup → the wider GCC

KSA setup lands Y3Q4 (Saudization-aligned JV, AED 1.5M, Series A-funded) — revenue from Y4. Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman follow platform-led. 3,000 deployed, AED 115M revenue by Y3.

M4 · 150 workers
M7 · break-even
M12 · 800 workers · app launch · AED 34M run-rate
M18 · OS pilots · self-funded scale
M33 · Series A (Y3Q3)
M36 · 3,000 workers · AED 115M
17 Investment Ask

AED 3,000,000 —
licence, launch, and the first 250 workers funded.

Use of funds

RTA deposit & licensing req.
1,000,000
Core team · 4 months
480,000
Worker mobilisation · 150+
450,000
Payroll float / working capital
380,000
Workforce OS · v1 build
250,000
Licensing, legal & compliance
150,000
Office setup & fit-out
120,000
Sales & marketing
120,000
Contingency
50,000
AED · bars scaled to the 1.0M deposit line.

What AED 3.0M unlocks

Licensed & deposit-secured Dubai operation · 150 workers across 6–10 clients by M4, funded path to 250 by M6 · replacement-SLA reputation · OS build on live shift data · ~AED 525K monthly billing exiting M4, break-even ~M6 → a de-risked, data-rich Series A story for KSA.

Downside protection & expansion deposits

AED 1.0M of this raise is a recoverable regulatory deposit — capital preserved, not burned. As Buraq expands, only DXB (Y1Q1) and AUH (Y3Q1) carry an AED 1.0M regulatory deposit — AED 2.0M of refundable capital in total. UAE legal has confirmed that SHJ, AIN and ROE launch under the existing licensing structure with no additional deposits, keeping expansion capital-light and funded entirely from operating cash. Revenue starts M3; the WC float and credit line keep the planned trough above zero.

Cash plan · first 4 months & quarterly outlook

M1 close 1.58 → M2 1.25 → M3 0.96 → M4 0.72, then a controlled glide to the year low of 0.09 at M11 before M12 turns positive (quarter-end 0.14) (AED M) — deposits land first, opex is metered, and collections begin M4–5. Position incl. receivables at M4: ~AED 1.05M.

QUARTERLY VIEW · Y1Q1 → Y3Q4 — OPERATING PROFIT & EXCESS CASH RESERVE (AED M)

48120.960.420.210.140.300.901.552.642.173.1011.5012.34ProfitReserveY1Q1−0.500.42Y1Q2−0.120.21Y1Q30.190.14Y1Q40.700.14Y2Q11.050.30Y2Q21.390.90Y2Q31.441.55Y2Q41.602.17Y3Q11.372.17Y3Q22.003.10Y3Q32.8011.50Y3Q42.8412.34 Operating profit (GP − fixed opex, P&L) · Excess cash reserve (closing − next-Q requirement, Cash Bridge) Closing cash · AED M · quarterly · base case · funding: seed 3.0 (Y1Q1) · Series A 6.7 (Y3Q3) · no debt, no facilityReserve positive in every quarter — self-funded by design · hover, tap or focus any bar for period, category, exact AED amount and formulaⓘ month-by-month table
18 Cap Table & Investor Returns

A seed structured for credible multiples, not fantasy.

Post-seedillustrative
Founders 76%Seed 20%ESOP 4%

AED 3.0M for 20% → AED 15M post-money (illustrative; final terms at close). ESOP grows to 10–12% by Series exit.

ⓘ valuation & dilution logic
Return frame · Y30.8×1.2×1.6×
Value (AED 111M revenue)89M133M178M
Seed stake (18.0% post-Series A)16.0M24.0M32.0M
Seed MOIC5.3×8.0×10.7×
ⓘ multiples & IRR in commercial terms

Why this seed is protected

AED 1.0M is a recoverable deposit. Revenue starts M3, break-even ~M6. The downside case is a profitable staffing business; the upside is workforce infrastructure with software economics — the platform layer argues for the upper multiple band.

ⓘ entry, exit & what can change
Illustrative assumptions — not a term sheet

Round-by-round mechanics

Ownership by round · % of fully diluted shares (illustrative, assumptions)

95%Formation76%20%Post-seed68.4%18.0%10%Post-Series A■ Founders ■ Seed ■ ESOP ■ Series A · % of fully diluted shares
RoundRaisePre-moneyPost-moneyNew investor %Existing after
Seed (Y1Q1)AED 3.0M12.0M15.0M20.0%×0.80 of pre-round stake
Series A (Y3Q3, illustrative)AED 6.7M60.0M66.7M10.0%×0.90 of pre-round stake
The mechanics
Post-money = pre-money + raise · New investor % = raise ÷ post-money · Every existing holder is diluted ×(1 − new %)

Share logic (illustrative, consistent throughout): 1,000,000 shares pre-seed (founders 950,000 · ESOP 50,000). Seed issues 250,000 new shares → 1,250,000 total → 20.0%. Series A (10% post-money) issues 138,889 → 1,388,889 total → seed becomes 250,000 ÷ 1,388,889 = 18.0%. All ownership figures in this deck are percentages of fully diluted shares — no unit or nominal-share shorthand is used.

Paper value · not a realized return

Seed return framing over 3 years

Funding round economics — conservative / base / upside, dilution included

12M24M36MPost-A 12.0 · 4.0×Seed 3.010.7×8.0×5.3×Seed closeY3Q3 · Series AY3 goalPAPER VALUE — NOT A REALIZED RETURN
MilestoneSeed stakeImplied company valueSeed holdingPaper MOIC
Seed close (Y1Q1)20.0%15M (post)3.0M1.0×
Post-Series A (Y3Q3)18.0%66.7M (post)12.0M4.0×
Y3 · conservative (0.8× rev)18.0%89M16.0M5.3×
Y3 · base (1.2× rev)18.0%133M24.0M8.0×
Y3 · upside (1.6× rev)18.0%178M32.0M10.7×
The formula
Paper MOIC = implied seed-holding value ÷ AED 3.0M invested · holding value = implied company value × 18.0% post-A stake

Paper value, not cash: no exit is assumed or guaranteed. Includes Series A dilution (10% new, Y3Q3) and the 5% ESOP set pre-seed; no later rounds, preferences or pool top-ups modeled. Y3 values mark AED 111M base revenue at 0.8–1.6× staffing multiples — the same frame as the returns table above.

Framework marks staffing at 0.8–1.6× revenue; the platform layer argues the upper band. Each card opens the return mechanics.
19 Investor Return Pathways

From equity to liquidity — four potential pathways

How owning Buraq equity can create investor value — through rising valuation, strategic secondary liquidity, profit distributions, or a major exit event. Illustrative pathways — subject to company performance, financing terms, cash availability, shareholder approvals, market conditions, and exit execution.

Valuation Growth Paper value

Equity becomes more valuable as company valuation increases — unrealized until liquidity.

60M120M180MSeed close · Y1Q1Post-money 15.0M · stake 20% → paper 3.0MSeries A · Y3Q3Post-money 66.7M · stake 18.0% → paper 12.0MY3 frames (0.8/1.2/1.6× revenue, AED 111M base)89 / 133 / 178M → stake paper 16.0 / 24.0 / 32.0MImplied stake value = company valuation × diluted ownership (18.0% after Series A)Conservative / base / upside branches · all figures are paper value, not realized cashUnrealized until a liquidity event or approved secondary · later valuations are illustrative

Strategic / Series Exit Illustrative

Part or all of a stake may be sold to a new investor in a future round or strategic transaction.

Seed close20.0% stakeSeries A · Y3Q3diluted to 18.0%Secondary salesell 25% of holding = 4.5% of companyLater round / strategicfull-exit optionProceeds ≈ AED 3.0M at the Series A price (66.7M post) ≈ 1.0× capital returnedRetained stake 13.5% — paper ≈ AED 9.0M at the same pricePrimarynew money into the companySecondaryexisting holder sells sharesStrategicstrategic party invests / acquiresFull exitsells all or most of the stakeIllustrative secondary or strategic liquidity scenario — rounds do not create liquidity by themselves.Any sale requires a willing buyer plus board and shareholder approvals.

Dividends Assumption

Proportional share when 70% of distributable profits are paid out from Y3Q1 — cash and governance permitting.

Distributable profit (Y3, after D&A & tax) AED 7.22M → 70% pool 5.05M · starts Y3Q1Distributableprofit 7.22M70% payout pool5.05M · 30% retainedSeed investor 18.0%receives 0.92MQuarterly payout (AED M) · guard: pay only if closing − dividend ≥ next-Q requirement + 1.0M reserveY3Q1paid 0.76investor share 0.14Y3Q2paid 1.21investor share 0.22Y3Q3paid 1.75investor share 0.32Y3Q4paid 1.32investor share 0.24Dividend = distributable profit × 70% × ownership (18.0%) · with no debt, the appraisal from Y3 and phased hiring, the cash guard is met comfortably and all four quarters payIllustrative overlay — the core plan retains 100% of profit; adopting it would reduce closing cash accordinglyNot contractual: subject to profitability, reserves, working capital, legal & tax requirements,board and shareholder approvals, and financing terms

Acquisition / IPO Illustrative

A major liquidity event converts paper value into realized proceeds.

TodayScale & densifyRegional platformExit windowliquidityConservative 0.8×exit value 89Mstake 18.0% → 16.0M · 5.3×Base 1.2×exit value 133Mstake 18.0% → 24.0M · 8.0×Upside 1.6×exit value 178Mstake 18.0% → 32.0M · 10.7×Exit-value scenarios — revenue-multiple frames on Y3 revenue 111.0M · acquisition or IPOImplied exit value = exit valuation × fully diluted ownership (18.0%) · MOIC = value ÷ AED 3.0M investedPaper before exit — realized only on a completed transactionIllustrative only — no exit is guaranteed · transaction costs, preferences and taxes not modelled
Equity ownershipOperating growthValuation creationLiquidity or distributions
INVESTOR LENS — SEED HOLDER VIEW
Seed investmentAED 3.0M · Y1Q1Model
Seed ownership at close20.0% (250,000 of 1,250,000 shares)Model
Stake after Series A (Y3Q3)18.0% fully dilutedModel
Implied paper value at Series AAED 12.0M (18.0% × 66.7M post)Paper value
Dividend policy70% of distributable profit from Y3Q1, cash-guardedAssumption
Y3 illustrative investor dividendsAED 0.92M cumulativePotential cash
Paper MOIC (base frame)8.0× (AED 24.0M ÷ 3.0M)Paper value
Every model-derived figure above reconciles to the cap table, P&L and cash bridge in this deck. Paper value is not cash; potential dividends are an illustrative overlay on a plan that otherwise retains 100% of profit; secondary sales require willing buyers and approvals; acquisition and IPO outcomes are aspirational frames, not forecasts.
20 Vision · Why This Wins

Every parcel in the GCC is carried
by a pair of hands. Buraq supplies the hands
and the intelligence behind them.

Staffing gets us in the building. Compliance keeps us there. The platform makes us impossible to replace. In five years, when a GCC logistics operator plans a peak, opens a dark store, or launches a city — the first system they open is Buraq.

Revenue from month three

A hero business with real cash flow — not a burn-and-pray marketplace.

A moat that deepens

Licence + bench + worker loyalty + data: each layer harder to copy than the last.

A region-sized prize

Six markets, one playbook, and a workforce OS with GCC-wide pricing power.

The Kinetic Effect
Dubai · HQRiyadhMumbaiKarachiManilaNairobiCairoDhakaLondonGold corridors: established sourcing markets feeding the UAE platform · teal: KSA expansion (Y3Q4 setup, revenue from Y4)Every corridor is licence-gated and quality-scored by the Workforce OS.THE KINETIC EFFECT — ONE PLATFORM, GLOBAL SUPPLY, GCC DEMAND

Buraq Kinetic · Buraq Staffing — The Workforce Intelligence Network
Seed round · AED 3,000,000 · Dubai, UAE